Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Paul's avatar

We all have the benefit of hindsight with the PG trade. I just hope that everyone retroactively calling it the worst trade of all time aren't the same people who thought at the time it made the Clippers instant championship favorites for as long as PG/Kawhi were together. Now they're giving that same benefit of the doubt to OKC. Their future looks bright on paper, but for all we know the Thunder could continue to have playoff disappointments too, health issues with their stars, or just trouble keeping guys in a small market.

Expand full comment
Barron Hall's avatar

If the second apron reduces draft pick devaluation by forcing teams to hold onto at least a few picks for the future, isn't that a good thing? Maybe teams with stop automatically resigning players at the maximum allowed amounts as well. As long as every team has to play by the same rules, parity will eventually happen, cap wise, at least. The smart management will evaluate and develop talent even und apron restrictions, but at least the bad teams are legislated to the minimum amount of stupidity.

Brook Lopez is a great example. Before Milwaukee could play fast and loose at the bottom of the roster to free up five or six million to sweeten Lopez resigning. The aprons may have ended those shenanigans. If Lopez wants to stay it won't be at the expense of other players. Now teams that might not have been considered can have the cap space - and opportunity - to try for a quality player.

Lopez fits nice with the Pels, but his skill set also matches the Bulls style of play - although Chicago would have to move Vucevich. Memphis could use Lopez for at least two years, depending on Zach Edey's learning curve and maybe moving away from Luke Kennard.

Neither Memphis or Chicago would want to use draft assets for Lopez, and to avoid the aprons Milwaukee might prefer cheaper and younger players in return. Win-Win.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts